Phil Fraim - President
Client
Selection
How many times we have heard an insured exclaim,
"I would have been much better off having never represented that client"!
Certainly, they are better off in terms of avoiding not only the aggravation of
dealing with the problem client, but also in avoiding the resulting malpractice
claim.
Our experience indicates malpractice claims can be
avoided if pre-established criteria are used to screen out potential problem
clients. Without a doubt, problem clients take on certain characteristics which
are identifiable early on, possibly even prior to representation. Recognition of
the following potential problems in advance and declining representation will
help avoid malpractice claims:
* Clients with unreasonable attitudes and
concerns over legal fees.
Our experience indicates the number of malpractice
claims arising from disputes over legal fees is on the increase. Every attorney
should bring up the subject of legal fees early on in order to gauge the clients
reaction. This reaction will let the attorney know what to expect from the
client in this area.
A strong reaction from the client regarding the
proposed fees makes it imperative for the attorney to reach a mutual agreement.
In the absence of a mutual agreement, the attorney is better off without that
particular client.
It is sometimes possible early on to discern the
client who has no intention of paying the fee (or at least the entire fee). This
is, definitely an individual to avoid, as your losses will double. Not only will
you provide free legal service, but also quite probably receive a malpractice
claim when you attempt to press the collection effort.
*Demanding
client.
These clients are insatiable and easily recognized
by the fact that they are already disgruntled. His/her problem is usually
complex, yet in spite of this, they', place unreasonable time constraints on
you. Their unhappiness often stems from poor prior service they received and
they demand legal retribution.
This particular client is best exemplified by the
fact that they have been to numerous attorneys, none of which have been able to
provide satisfactory legal service. This client is most dangerous and should be
avoided.
*Uncontrollable client.
This particular client may appear behind several
faces. It may be the individual who is unreasonably demanding because of a
complete lack of understanding of the legal system. Another possibility is the
person who has totally unrealistic expectations about his/her case. Also, there
is the individual who just simply cannot be controlled and is his/her own worst
enemy, creating more obstacles than can be hurdled.
*Client seeking
revenge.
To this client, the value of the case has little,
if any, meaning. They are driven more by a moral vendetta, not a legal remedy,
and if they do not receive vindication they may seek it from their attorney.
Obviously, the early stages of the attorney/client
relationship are critical and many legal malpractice lawsuits can be avoided by
screening out potentially troublesome clients. Remember, if you elect not to
take on the representation of an individual, advise them in writing that the
attorney/client relationship did not commence.
Avoiding trouble is easier and less costly
then getting out of trouble.
Posted on
Monday, July 14, 2008
by Matt Mueggenborg